docs: todo and readme

This commit is contained in:
Jun Kurihara 2023-07-24 22:02:40 +09:00
commit 7116c02032
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: D992B3E3DE1DED23
2 changed files with 6 additions and 5 deletions

View file

@ -10,13 +10,13 @@
- upstream/upstream group: information on targeted destinations for each set of (a domain + a path)
- load-balance: load balancing mod for a domain + path
- **Almost done in version 0.4.0**:
Split `rpxy` source codes into `rpxy-lib` and `rpxy-bin` to make the core part (reverse proxy) isolated from the misc part like toml file loader. This is in order to make the configuration-related part more flexible (related to [#33](https://github.com/junkurihara/rust-rpxy/issues/33))
- Done in v0.4.0:
~~Split `rpxy` source codes into `rpxy-lib` and `rpxy-bin` to make the core part (reverse proxy) isolated from the misc part like toml file loader. This is in order to make the configuration-related part more flexible (related to [#33](https://github.com/junkurihara/rust-rpxy/issues/33))~~
- Cache option for the response with `Cache-Control: public` header directive ([#55](https://github.com/junkurihara/rust-rpxy/issues/55))
- Consideration on migrating from `quinn` and `h3-quinn` to other QUIC implementations ([#57](https://github.com/junkurihara/rust-rpxy/issues/57))
- Benchmark with other reverse proxy implementations like Sozu ([#58](https://github.com/junkurihara/rust-rpxy/issues/58))
- Currently, Sozu can work only on `amd64` format due to its HTTP message parser limitation... Since the main developer have only `arm64` (Apple M1) laptops, so we should do that on VPS?
- Done in v0.4.0:
~~Benchmark with other reverse proxy implementations like Sozu ([#58](https://github.com/junkurihara/rust-rpxy/issues/58)) Currently, Sozu can work only on `amd64` format due to its HTTP message parser limitation... Since the main developer have only `arm64` (Apple M1) laptops, so we should do that on VPS?~~
- Unit tests
- Options to serve custom http_error page.