tuxmain/rust-rpxy
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

feat: totally updated cache structure using lru crate instead of moka (i.e., using simpler crate)

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Jun Kurihara 2023-08-16 23:04:04 +09:00
commit 07d3accb91
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: D992B3E3DE1DED23
10 changed files with 157 additions and 132 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

5
TODO.md
View file

@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
# TODO List
- [Done in 0.6.0] But we need more sophistication on `Forwarder` struct. ~~Fix strategy for `h2c` requests on forwarded requests upstream. This needs to update forwarder definition. Also, maybe forwarder would have a cache corresponding to the following task.~~
- [Try in v0.6.0] **Cache option for the response with `Cache-Control: public` header directive ([#55](https://github.com/junkurihara/rust-rpxy/issues/55))**
- [Initial implementation in v0.6.0] ~~**Cache option for the response with `Cache-Control: public` header directive ([#55](https://github.com/junkurihara/rust-rpxy/issues/55))**~~ Using `lru` crate might be inefficient in terms of the speed. Also, this cache feature should be a separated `feature` (But I think okay to be included in `default`).
- Consider more sophisticated architecture for cache
- Persistent cache (if possible).
- etc etc
- Improvement of path matcher
- More flexible option for rewriting path
- Refactoring